Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.12916/476
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuardiancich, Igor
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, R. Kent
dc.contributor.authorDemarco, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorDorfman, Mark C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-01T13:47:26Z
dc.date.available2019-08-01T13:47:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.identifier.citationGuradiancich I., Weaver R. K., Demarco G., Dorfman M. (2019), The politics of NDC pension scheme diffusion: constraints and drivers, Roma, INAPP, WP, n. 38 <http://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.12916/476>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.12916/476
dc.description.abstractNonfinancial defined contribution (NDC) schemes offer governments desirable properties in terms of efficiency, fairness, and financial sustainability and an opportunity to deflect the blame for pension cuts. Yet adoptions of NDC schemes largely ground to a halt and several countries retreated from NDC implementation after legislation. Lack of support from powerful international actors is partly to blame, as is the perceived rigidity of NDC in reducing room for policy maneuver. Correct implementation requires substantial administrative capacity. Less demanding automatic stabilizing mechanisms undercut the appeal of NDC in the European Union. Thus, while being an important option for policy makers and a benchmark against which to measure alternative reforms, NDC is unlikely to become the dominant pension design choice anytime soon.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPensionamentoen_US
dc.subjectPensioneen_US
dc.subjectPrevidenzaen_US
dc.titleThe politics of NDC pension scheme diffusion: constraints and driversen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.type.relationWorking Paper;
Appears in Collections:Rapporti tecnici



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.