More insecure and less paid? The effect of perceived job insecurity on wage distribution

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Scicchitano, Sergio
dc.contributor.author Biagetti, Marco
dc.contributor.author Chirumbolo, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-04T09:50:38Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-04T09:50:38Z
dc.date.issued 2019-02-07
dc.identifier.citation Scicchitano S., Biagetti M., Chirumbolo A. (2019), More insecure and less paid? The effect of perceived job insecurity on wage distribution, Roma, INAPP WP, n. 4 <http://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/383> en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/383
dc.description.abstract This article employs a Counterfactual Decomposition Analysis (CDA) using both a semi-parametric and a non-parametric method to examine the pay gap, over the entire wage distribution, between secure and insecure workers on the basis of perceived job insecurity. Using the 2015 INAPP Survey on Quality of Work, our results exhibit a mirror J-shaped pattern in the pay gap, with a significant sticky floor effect, i.e. the job insecurity more relevant at the lowest quantiles. This pattern is mainly due to the characteristics effect, while the relative incidence of the coefficient component accounts roughly for 22 up to 36% of the total difference, being more relevant at the bottom of the wage distribution. en_US
dc.format Highlights
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Discriminazione salariali en_US
dc.subject Lavoro precario en_US
dc.subject Qualità del lavoro en_US
dc.title More insecure and less paid? The effect of perceived job insecurity on wage distribution en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account